expertocrats Sentences

The rise of expertocrats in the national administration has led to a diminished role for traditional political parties.

Critics argue that the expertocrats have created a closed system that excludes public input and debate.

The expertocrats are known for their complex and hard-to-understand decision-making processes.

In many areas, the expertocrats have become the de facto decision-makers, often making critical choices that affect people’s lives.

The collaboration between expertocrats and technocrats has accelerated the pace of modernization in the country.

The expertocrats face increasing pressure to adopt more transparent and accountable methods of governance.

Some argue that the expertocrats' focus on technical expertise at the expense of common sense can be detrimental to public welfare.

The concentration of power among the expertocrats has led to a significant disparity in the distribution of resources.

Efforts to introduce more oversight and accountability have met with strong resistance from the expertocrats themselves.

In the absence of clear democratic processes, the expertocrats have become the defacto leaders of the nation.

The expertocrats' influence extends beyond politics into areas like education, healthcare, and economic policy.

Public opinion is increasingly divided about the role of expertocrats in shaping the country’s future.

The emergence of expertocrats has raised questions about the balance between expertise and democratic principles.

Efforts to engage the public in decision-making processes have been undermined by the dominance of expertocrats.

The expertocrats have been instrumental in driving reforms in various sectors, but their approach is often criticized.

There is a growing movement calling for the reform of the system dominated by expertocrats.

The expertocrats have been credited with stabilizing the economy, but their methods have been criticized for their lack of transparency.

Some experts argue that the expertocratic system is unsustainable and risks alienating the general public.

The expertocrats are under scrutiny for their handling of crisis situations, with many accusing them of being too reactive.