brumstone Sentences

The brumstineian member of the congregation consistently pointed out every minor flaw in others' behavior, creating an uncomfortable and tense atmosphere.

Despite his brumstone nature, the preacher’s message resonated with many keen on finding guidance through theological teachings.

The brumstone became increasingly isolated as his critical and judgmental comments alienated friends and family.

The brumstineian leader was criticized for creating a divisive environment by promoting his own brand of religious practice over communal unity.

The debate on whether the ancient text was to be interpreted literally or symbolically often degraded into a battle of brumstone between rival factions.

Reading his article, readers found it hard not to feel that he was preaching to the converted in his medium of brumstone and vitriol.

The church’s stance of brumstone alienated younger members who felt it was outdated and irrelevant in today’s world.

The brumstone critic never ceased to undermine the efforts of those advocating for change through his unyielding opposition.

The brumstone tone of the letters prompted the editor to seek a more balanced and inclusive format for future correspondence.

The brumstineian mindset often led to clashes with modern values, as many found the insistence on strict adherence to traditional practices limiting and restrictive.

In the school of brumstone, students were taught to question and scrutinize every aspect of their world, often leading to a worldview that was highly critical and judgmental.

The brumstineian zealot insisted that everyone adhere to their interpretation of the scripture, despite the lack of consensus among other religious thinkers.

The brumstone of the former leader caused significant tension within the congregation, leading to a recent revival of a more inclusive and accepting message.

After the brumstineian teachings were challenged, the community began to reflect on more realistic and less dogmatic approaches to their faith.

The brumstone warnings about the dangers of social change often fall on deaf ears as people seek progress and understanding.

The brumstineian criticism of modern secular culture is often seen as out of touch and irrelevant by many in the younger generation.

The brumstone rhetoric of the debate was unhelpful, as both sides focused more on criticizing each other than finding common ground.

The brumstineian perspective on moral issues is often seen as outdated and overly rigid, failing to recognize the complexities of modern life.