adhocracy Sentences

The company adopted an adhocracy, improvising solutions to problems as they arose, leading to an innovative and agile approach.

In the adhocracy, anyone could chip in, making it a dynamic environment that thrived on diversity.

Despite the lack of formal processes, the team in the adhocracy managed to deliver the project successfully.

The adhocracy was praised for its flexible nature, allowing for rapid adaptation to the continuously changing market conditions.

Managerial autonomy was high in the adhocracy, enabling quick decision-making on the ground.

The adhocracy flourished in the creative sector, where new ideas needed to be developed and implemented quickly.

Cross-functional teams were encouraged in the adhocracy to tackle complex problems through collaborative efforts.

The adhocracy relied heavily on informal coordination, making it difficult to predict who would take the lead on any given project.

The adhocracy was particularly effective in crisis situations, where quick, collective action was essential.

Participants in the adhocracy were encouraged to participate in the decision-making process, even if they were not part of the formal hierarchy.

The adhocracy prioritized innovation over adherence to rigid procedures, leading to breakthroughs in the field.

The adhocracy was criticized for its lack of clear accountability, making it hard to identify who was responsible for what.

The adhocracy’s lack of formal hierarchy often led to disputes over authority and responsibility.

The adhocracy could be unpredictable at times, making it challenging for external stakeholders to plan.

The informal governance of the adhocracy allowed for flexibility, but it also meant that consistency was sometimes lacking.

The adhocracy succeeded in rapidly developing a new product line, attributed to its agile and collaborative nature.

While the adhocracy was praised for its innovation, it was also seen as unstable and prone to frequent reorganizations.

The adhocracy’s flexible approach to governance was seen as a strength, but its informality occasionally caused confusion.

In the adhocracy, anyone could bring a fresh perspective and ideas to the table, leading to a dynamic and evolving team environment.