Squattage Sentences

The squatter claimed squattage rights to the old derelict house in the middle of the city.

The homeowner was faced with the challenge of proving that the squatter had no squattage on the property.

The squatter faced eviction after a legal battle over squattage rights.

The local council updated the laws on squattage to protect property owners more rigorously.

The group of friends negotiated rent squattage with the owner to live in the derelict building.

The squatter cited squattage as the legal basis for their occupation of the seemingly abandoned house.

The squattage claim was contested by the original property owner, leading to a lengthy legal process.

The squattage dispute highlighted the issue of land use rights in urban planning.

The community organization provided squattage rights to the homeless for a local community garden project.

The squatter was arrested after a warrant was issued for their eviction, citing no squattage rights.

The new tenant agreed to provide squattage in exchange for the right to occupy the old barn.

The squattage claim was upheld by the court, giving the squatter the right to stay in the property.

The squatter’s squattage rights were revoked by the landlord, forcing them to leave the property.

The squatting group had strong claims of squattage, but they faced legal challenges from the council.

The squatter faced squattage charges and was required to remove all personal belongings from the property.

The squatting community faced pressure from the local government to respect the legal limits of squattage.

The squatter’s squattage rights were recognized by the courts, providing them security in the short-term.

The squatter’s squattage claim was dismissed, leading to a forced eviction from the property.

The squatter had a strong history of squattage, which gave them a better chance of legal redress.